SIGHTINGS


 
Russians Furious Over Iraq Bombing - New 'Cold War' Could Result
http://www.independent.co.uk/stories/A1912802.html
 
 
By Phil Reeves in Moscow
The Independent (London)www.independent.co.uk
 
 
 
RUSSIA's relations with the West were yesterday gripped by one of the sharpest frosts since the end of the Cold War after Moscow withdrew its ambassador to Britain "for consultations" in a protest over the air strikes against Iraq.
 
The move, which followed the recall of Russia's envoy to Washington, came amid a second day of angry and indignant declarations from Moscow, including a threat to re-assess its entire security strategy.
 
The Prime Minister, Yevgeny Primakov, declared that the bombardment of Iraq "violates the entire world order established after the Second World War".
 
And Russia's ascendant Communists, the largest force in parliament, confirmed they had no intention of considering the ratification of the Start-2 arms-reduction treaty.
 
Western diplomats were yesterday gloomily surveying the political damage done by Operation Desert Fox to the arms- reduction process - Start-2, after faltering signs of life, is now dead in the water - and to their efforts to end the distrust that surrounds Moscow's relations with Nato.
 
"Unfortunately, things will now stagnate," said one. Evidence of that came when Russia's Defence Minister, Marshal Igor Sergeyev, decided not to attend a meeting of the Nato-Russia Permanent Council, dispatching a less senior official in his place.
 
However, the Kremlin needs the West, and it knows it. It tacitly acknowledged the weakness of its position by emphasising that there was no question of severing relations with the United States and Britain.
 
The row over Iraq must not be allowed to "slide into confrontation," said a spokesman.
 
The withdrawal of Yuri Fokin, Moscow's ambassador to London, marks the first such occasion since the Soviet Union pulled out its envoy in 1971 in a tit-for-tat spy row in which Britain expelled 105 Soviet diplomats.
 
The Foreign Office yesterday sought to play down Russia's outrage, saying that Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, had a "friendly" conversation with his Russian counterpart, Igor Ivanov.
 
Both the British and the Americans expressed confidence that the relationship with Russia - already chilled by the new government of Mr Primakov and the current economic melt-down - would survive.
 
To the apparent puzzlement of Washington, the Russians have also responded to the Iraq crisis by moving troops and placing some military installations on heightened alert.
 
The US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, said the purpose of the troop movements was unclear, although the Kremlin explained them as a routine response to heightened international tensions.
 
In reality, Russia is in a bind. It feels genuinely aggrieved by the US and Britain's decision to bypass the UN Security Council - one of the few forums in which Moscow feels it has a measure of the diplomatic weight it enjoyed in Soviet times.
 
In this case, its highly coveted status as one of five permanent members has proved next to worthless.
 
It also has plenty of reasons to speak up for Saddam Hussein. Moscow has already signed dozens of lucrative contracts, including weapons sales, with Baghdad which will kick in once UN sanctions are lifted. Iraq also owes it about $8bn in Soviet-era debts, which the impoverished Russians would dearly love to bank.
 
For the same reason, Moscow hopes that its current loyalty - a follow-on from the era in which thousands of Soviet engineers and advisers worked in Iraq - will be repaid with some fat deals, notably in the oil and construction sector, when the day arrives when a sanctions-free Baghdad finally begins to rebuild.
 
And it will be also looking for some international diplomatic gains - stronger ties, for example, with the Arab world which will allow it to further its general policy of challenging US supremacy and pushing for a "multi-polar" international political environment.
 
Yet Russia - as the Pentagon well knows - is also acutely aware that it needs the United States and the West, particularly after the precipitous economic collapse that began in August.
 
Telling evidence of that came yesterday when an aide for Yuri Maslyukov, First Deputy Prime Minister, said the Iraq crisis should not affect Russia's current talks with the International Monetary Fund, from which Moscow needs funds if it is to avoid a gaping hole in next year's budget.
 
With equal eagerness, officials said that negotiations with Washington over a $850m food-aid deal were proceeding as planned, despite the bombing raids.
 
It seems that Russia is prepared to bark at the hand that feeds it, but it is unlikely to bite it.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE